2nd Amendment to the US constitution + end of the text

<br /> (Sorry, I forget to write the vocabulary) :<br /> Vocabulary :<br /> bewildered = confused and surprised<br /> fellow compatriots = compatriotes (terme positif)<br /> accusing = accusateur<br /> even though = même si<br /> culprit = coupable<br /> figures = chiffres, statistiques<br /> biaised = partiale<br /> to blame ... for = reprocher quelque chose<br /> lack of gun control = manque de contrôle sur les armes (à feu).<br /> <br /> <br />

<br /> ( Sorry, but you must mistake : you told me in class to write the lesson, because tomorrow I won't be there, I will have the "Concours général", so I have to write it today instead of Selma.)<br /> <br /> Règle de phonétique :<br /> Doublement d'une consonne : impossibilité de voyelle diphtonguée. Ex : Write --> written, trigger, thriller.<br /> [ai] [i] [i] [i]<br /> Questions :<br /> The questions reveal that the narrator is in shock. He doesn't understand why parents would give their six-year-old a gun for Christmas. He is both surprised and confused. He is bewildered. He is<br /> very critical with his fellow compatriots. He tries to understand the situation but he doesn't.<br /> <br /> a fellow = un type / a bloke = un pote.<br /> <br /> Tone of the end of the text :<br /> The tone of the text is critical and accusing. Even though it looks like a newspaper article, it isn't. The author gives his point of view about gun violence in the US and tries to find the<br /> culprit. Even though he uses facts and figures/statistics, his demonstration is biaised/not neutral/not unbiaised. He blames the media and video games for the violence in the US. He also blames the<br /> lack of gun control.<br /> <br /> <br />